Workplace safety, safety culture, leadership and risk management — international perspective.
Por Andreza Araujo Global Safety Culture Specialist
Autor
Global Safety Culture Specialist
Andreza Araujo is an international reference in EHS, safety culture and safe behavior, with 25+ years leading cultural transformation programs in multinational companies and impacting employees in more than 30 countries. Recognized as a LinkedIn Top Voice, she contributes to the public conversation on leadership, safety culture and prevention for a global professional audience. Civil engineer and occupational safety engineer from Unicamp, with a master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva. Author of 16 books on safety culture, leadership and SIF prevention, and host of the Headline Podcast.
A pre-mortem safety review helps EHS managers expose weak controls, hidden assumptions, and decision gaps before high-risk work begins.
Corrective action closure proves little unless EHS can show that controls changed, exposure fell, and leaders verified the result in the field.
Safety conversations change behavior only when supervisors discuss risk, pressure, and controls without turning observation into blame.
Post-traumatic stress in emergency responders needs work-design controls before debriefing becomes the only answer after critical incidents.
Safety accountability fails when leaders use it as a word for frontline blame instead of testing whether authority, controls, and pressure were aligned.
The EHS firefighter role looks useful in a crisis, but it hides weak ownership, late escalation, and leadership systems that keep risk alive.
Procurement safety changes contractor risk before mobilization by making supervision, stop-work rights and reporting part of the commercial model.
Residual risk acceptance should prove control strength, decision authority, expiry, and escalation before leaders allow exposure to continue.
An executive safety dashboard should move beyond TRIR and show whether serious exposure, control weakness, reporting trust, and leadership action are changing.
ICAM investigation works when EHS teams validate failed defenses before naming causes, so corrective actions change work rather than paperwork.