Andreza Araújo

Entity Home

Andreza Araújo

Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive

Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.

Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.

She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.

Formal credentials

  • Civil & Safety Engineer (Unicamp)
  • M.A. Environmental Diplomacy (University of Geneva)
  • Sustainability Cert (IMD Switzerland)
  • People Management & Coaching (Ohio University)
  • UN Paris speaker representative for Brazil
  • ILO Turin speaker
  • LinkedIn Top Voice
  • Indra Nooyi PepsiCo CEO recognition (2x)

Selected books

Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice

ISBN 6500447182

Cultura de Segurança

Andreza Araújo

Liderança Antifrágil

Andreza Araújo

A Ilusão da Conformidade

Andreza Araújo

Sorte ou Capacidade

Andreza Araújo

Muito Além do Zero

Andreza Araújo

Antifragile Leadership

Andreza Araújo

Podcasts she hosts

Headline Podcast in English

Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.

O Conselho de Segurança

Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.

Articles by this author

600 articles
incident-investigation

How 250+ Safety Projects Turned RCA Into Control Restoration

A case-study article on how incident investigation becomes useful when RCA produces restored controls, named owners, and field verification.

6 min
risk-management

ALARP vs SFAIRP vs Risk Appetite: Which Fits?

ALARP, SFAIRP, and risk appetite answer different safety risk questions. Use this comparison to avoid board-level risk acceptance errors.

9 min
psychosocial-risks

ISO 45003 vs WHO Guidelines vs ILO C190

Compare ISO 45003, WHO mental health guidance, and ILO C190 to decide which reference should lead a psychosocial-risk program.

7 min
risk-management

FMEA Risk Assessment: 9 Blind Spots Before Controls

FMEA risk assessment fails when teams score failure modes before they understand exposure, control strength, and field verification.

10 min
psychological-safety

Speak-Up Retaliation Risk: 4 Signals Leaders Misread

Retaliation risk after speaking up is visible in follow-up behavior, supervisor response, peer reaction, and whether inconvenient concerns change decisions.

6 min
safe-behavior

Shortcut Normalization: 8 Failures Behind Risky Work

A field diagnostic for supervisors who need to see when repeated shortcuts become the real operating method before an injury exposes the drift.

6 min
psychosocial-risks

HR Business Partner in 60 Days: Psychosocial Risk Triage

A role-profile guide for HR business partners who need to turn psychosocial risk from a vague wellbeing concern into visible work-design evidence within 60 days.

9 min
risk-management

Procurement Manager in 90 Days: Contractor Safety Plan

A 90-day role plan for procurement managers to build contractor safety into scope, prequalification, bid evaluation, and field verification.

6 min
safety-leadership

New Maintenance Manager in 90 Days: What to Do in the First Quarter

A new maintenance manager can protect safety in the first quarter by stabilizing control ownership, backlog decisions, supervision routines, and risk escalation.

7 min
risk-management

Hazard Identification Explained: Sources, Triggers, and Control Links

Hazard identification is the discipline of finding credible sources of harm before risk assessment, control selection, and field verification begin.

5 min