Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice
ISBN 6500447182
Entity Home
Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive
Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.
Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.
She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.
ISBN 6500447182
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.
Host of the Portuguese-language podcast, with interviews and conversations on safety culture and EHS.
Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.

A safety walk is useful only when it tests how work is actually performed. These six questions help leaders distinguish field evidence from staged compliance and turn observations into control decisions.

The General Symptom Index can help EHS and HR teams detect patterns in reported distress, but a score is not a diagnosis or a substitute for work-design analysis. This guide explains four tests that keep well-being data useful and responsible.

Build supervisor curiosity into an eight-step shift routine that tests controls, makes technical dissent usable, and turns questions into clear safety decisions.
Across more than 250 safety culture transformation projects, Andreza Araujo has seen the same measurement error repeat. Leaders count training, observations, and closed actions as improvement before checking whether the work became easier to control. This case-based article follows the shift from activity reporting to field evidence.

TRIR, SIF exposure, and control effectiveness answer different executive questions. This comparison shows which signal should guide accountability, prioritization, and assurance.

Safety data can be accurate and still arrive too late for risk decisions. This F1 diagnostic shows leaders how to identify decision latency, assign operational ownership, preserve near-miss context, and verify that closed actions changed the work.

A safety committee chair is not elected to collect complaints or repeat policy language. The role is to help the committee turn worker experience into decisions that remove exposure, clarify ownership, and show whether controls work in ordinary operations.
Workload recovery is not a wellness slogan or a request for people to cope better. It is the management capacity to notice when work intensity, shift design, and low control are reducing the attention needed for safe decisions.

A task authorization conversation tests whether the person, plan, controls, and decision authority are aligned before high-risk work begins. These eight checks help supervisors replace a routine briefing with a reliable field decision.
A root cause analysis can be polished, approved, and still leave the same exposure in the work. These four myths show where incident investigations become complete on paper before they become useful in the field.