Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice
ISBN 6500447182
Entity Home
Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive
Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.
Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.
She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.
ISBN 6500447182
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.
Host of the Portuguese-language podcast, with interviews and conversations on safety culture and EHS.
Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.

Residual risk is the exposure that remains after controls are selected and verified. This explainer defines four acceptance conditions that prevent a risk matrix from turning an unresolved decision into permission to proceed.

This eight-step review helps plant managers, HR leaders, and EHS teams test whether workload, staffing, interruptions, recovery, and decision rights are creating psychosocial risk in the work itself.

The Challenger case shows why speaking up is not enough when technical warnings cannot change a high-risk decision before harm occurs.

A job safety analysis, risk matrix, and field verification answer different questions. This comparison shows which one a supervisor should trust first, what each method misses, and how to combine them without creating paperwork that substitutes for control.

Operational change can weaken safety without producing an obvious policy violation. These six blind spots help EHS managers and operations leaders test whether a change preserves critical controls, decision rights, and field evidence after the project plan is approved.

A 45-day role plan for a new shift manager to turn handover, control verification, worker voice, and escalation into decisions that hold under pressure.

SIF exposure describes work that could produce a serious injury or fatality even when the recent incident count is low. These four consequence checks help EHS leaders distinguish ordinary event frequency from the controls that protect people from the worst credible outcome.

A signed excavation plan is only a starting point. This eight-step field review helps a competent person, supervisor, or EHS manager confirm that soil conditions, utilities, protective systems, access, plant movement, and rescue decisions match the work about to begin.

Fast decisions are not automatically strong safety leadership. This mythbusting guide shows how urgency, escalation, authority, evidence, and follow-through determine whether a safety decision reduces exposure or merely creates the appearance of control.

A purchase order can satisfy a commercial process while leaving the real exposure unchanged. This F1 diagnostic shows how EHS, engineering, operations, and procurement leaders can test whether a safety-critical purchase will still protect people after delivery, installation, handover, and maintenance.