Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice
ISBN 6500447182
Entity Home
Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive
Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.
Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.
She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.
ISBN 6500447182
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.
Host of the Portuguese-language podcast, with interviews and conversations on safety culture and EHS.
Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.

Work ability is the relationship between a person's resources and the demands of a job at a given time. This explainer shows four management signals that can reveal when work design, recovery, or support needs attention before performance and safety deteriorate.

Decision fatigue is not a personal weakness. It is an operational condition that appears when supervisors must make too many small safety decisions with unclear priorities, incomplete information, or constant interruption. This eight-step guide shows how to review the shift, remove avoidable choices, and protect the decisions that cannot be delegated.

The PepsiCo South America case is often reduced to a 50% accident-ratio result. Its more useful lesson is operational. Across seven countries, 30 factories, and 168 distribution centers, a 180-day plan made leadership decisions more visible and connected executive intent with field execution.

An EAP, a manager check-in, and an occupational health referral solve different problems. This comparison helps leaders choose the right route by urgency, confidentiality, work-related exposure, functional impact, and need for workplace controls.

An incident investigation should do more than explain what happened. It should show which control failed, what decision allowed the exposure to remain, and what evidence proves the risk is different now. This F1 diagnostic helps EHS leaders and operations managers find four evidence breaks that make corrective action look complete while leaving the hazard in place.

A 45-day role profile for a new safety data steward to clarify measure definitions, test data at the workface, assign decision ownership, and make escalation evidence visible.

Job Safety Analysis and Job Hazard Analysis often describe the same family of work, but the label can hide different scopes, task boundaries, and control expectations. This guide separates four practical distinctions so supervisors can choose the right analysis without confusing paperwork with risk control.

A safety decision checkpoint gives operations leaders a short, repeatable way to resolve open risk before it becomes normal work. This guide shows supervisors and managers how to structure the meeting, test evidence, assign authority, and close the communication loop.

An EAP referral can connect an employee with confidential support, but it does not remove the work conditions that may be creating strain. These five myths show operations leaders how to pair support with accountable work-design action.

A named risk owner is not the same as an owned control. This F1 diagnostic shows how directors, operations leaders, and EHS managers can test whether accountability reaches the decisions that keep high-consequence exposure controlled in the field.