Safety Culture: From Theory to Practice
ISBN 6500447182
Entity Home
Safety Culture Expert | Senior EHS Executive
Andreza Araújo is a safety culture expert and senior EHS executive with more than 25 years of experience in environment, health and safety. She is a Civil Engineer and Occupational Safety Engineer from Unicamp, holds a Master's degree in Environmental Diplomacy from the University of Geneva, and completed sustainability studies at IMD Switzerland.
Andreza has served in Global Head of EHS roles in Fortune 500 environments, leading cultural transformation programs across multinational operations. She has represented Brazil as a speaker at the United Nations in Paris and has spoken at the International Labour Organization in Turin.
She is the author of more than 16 books on safety culture in Portuguese, Spanish, English and German. Her work has earned more than 10 EHS awards, including two recognitions from Indra Nooyi, former PepsiCo CEO.
ISBN 6500447182
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Andreza Araújo
Host and editorial lead of the English-language podcast, with conversations on safety leadership, EHS and organizational culture.
Host of the Portuguese-language podcast, with interviews and conversations on safety culture and EHS.
Host of this Portuguese spin-off, with debates and guidance on safety leadership and culture.

Stop-work authority is not proven by a policy statement or a training module. It is proven by what happens after someone raises a concern, including who decides, how work is changed, and whether the person receives a clear response.

The Bradley Curve describes four stages of safety culture maturity, from reactive dependence on rules to interdependent ownership. This guide explains what each stage reveals and why the label must be tested against real decisions.

A return-to-work conversation after mental-health absence should focus on work capacity, support, adjustments, and review rather than diagnosis or private treatment. This eight-step guide helps managers prepare a humane, operationally useful plan.

The BP Texas City case shows why injury totals and completed programs can hide process-safety exposure when warning evidence never changes a decision.

Safety governance works when boards, executives, and field leaders make different decisions from the same risk evidence. This comparison shows who should review what and when.

A risk matrix can support a decision, but it can also make serious exposure look controlled. This diagnostic shows plant managers and EHS leaders where matrix logic fails and how to compare the score with field evidence.

A new reliability manager should not begin with a larger backlog report. This 45-day plan connects deferred maintenance, critical controls, escalation rights, and field evidence.

Middle managers often carry pressure from senior leaders, frontline teams, and personal recovery at once. This explainer shows four pressure zones that can change safer decisions.
A safety-critical change can create new exposure even when the project appears complete. This guide gives plant managers, engineering leads, and EHS professionals an eight-step review that connects the change to hazards, controls, training, emergency readiness, and field verification before startup.
Management of change is often treated as an approval form, yet temporary decisions can alter critical controls, handovers, staffing, and emergency readiness long after the original urgency has passed. This article challenges five common myths and gives risk leaders a practical standard for keeping changed conditions visible, owned, verified, and either restored or formally adopted.